Seeing the Chains

"When Christians came to visit the Apostle Paul in Rome and saw his chains, some of them may have wept or felt defeated. Perhaps some of them stopped witnessing. But later, when they faced a hostile public, they did not back down. Seeing Paul in chains had prepared them spiritually for the fight that lay ahead.

"In Philippians 1:14, Paul writes, "Most of the brethren in the Lord, having become confident by my chains, are much more bold to speak the word without fear."

(Tom White, from Voice of the Martyrs, October 2010)

The Success of the Cross, by Moishe Rosen

"If accepting rejection is the key to success, we need to remember that while many were crucified, only one of those crucified rose from the dead. We should not follow the many who were merely punished and be crucified for the honor of it. We need to follow the crucified one who rose from the dead and thus nullified the crucifixion. It is how we accept that rejection by the world and the newness of life given by the savior.

"Calvary was redemptive and if we can respond to rejection the way that Jesus did, our Calvary's will also be redemptive. There is a holy dissatisfaction that we must allow ourselves to feel. We need to recognize that we could be more, and do more for God if we were only willing to accept the fact of failure as a beginning point.

"Some of us need to get desperate in order to do the right thing. Some of us will never care enough to become desperate to become effective missionaries. Some of us will never find the courage to carry our crosses and accept the crucified life. Sometime we need to see ourselves as failures so that we can repent and receive the holy energy that comes from being filled with the Spirit. No one can be filled with the Spirit when he or she is filled with themselves. We need to become empty of self and filled with the Spirit. For that we need a personal Calvary of dying to sin, self, the world and rising in resurrection power to gain the victories God has for us.

"We succeed by failing, we win by losing, and our apparent defeat becomes our victory."

from "The Fact of Failure", Seventh International LCJE Conference, Helsinki, Finland, 2003. Moishe Rosen is the founder of Jews for Jesus. In honor of his passing to be with the Lord, May 19, 2010.

Jesus and Failure, by Moishe Rosen

"Jesus was a failure as the world sees things. Thousands came to hear him and were enthralled with his message but at the end only dozens remained and that included his mother and siblings. His meteoric rise to popularity began when he was thirty and he was a 'has been' three years later. The triumphal entry might be seen as his comeback trail. He was a gifted communicator and one can imagine that he was thought to lose his cool when he called the religious leaders of his time "whited sepulchers and vipers". Some might have thought he went off the deep end when he was not received after the 'triumphal entry' and he entered the temple to deal violently with the money changers and sheep sellers. As a celebrity, he as on a downward path so far as popularity was concerned.

"But he was not a failure because people failed to see who he was and what was being offered. His way of dealing with rejection was not to accommodate himself to what the people could regard as being a politically wise ruler. He was true to himself and to his principles but most of all he was true to Calvary which was to be his Coronation and Victory."

from "The Fact of Failure", Seventh International LCJE Conference, Helsinki, Finland, 2003. Moishe Rosen is the founder of Jews for Jesus. In honor of his passing to be with the Lord, May 19, 2010.

Trilobite Eyes-Anything but Primitive

Evolution's "first" known compound eye is far more complicated than the eyes of any vertebrates. How could that be ?

Selections from The Mystery of Trilobite Evolution, by Jerry Bergman

Marko’s summary: Trilobites supposedly evolved half a billion years ago as some of the simplest of creatures.  Yet there eyes are anything but primitive - they are among the most complex eyes known! The "real surprise" for evolutionists is that the "basic lens designs" of trilobite eyes were engineered "with such ingenuity." If you want an answer, don't go Back in Time, go Back to God!

(These selections by Marko Malyj are of the article published in Creation Research Society Quarterly Journal, Volume 47, Number 1, Summer, 2010, to appear at http://www.creationresearch.org/crsq/abstracts/Abstracts47-1.htm).

The Trilobite Eye

The trilobite eye is the first known eye. Trilobites possessed the first known "compound" (multi-lensed) eye design type (specifically the diopter apparatus) that has been preserved in detail in the fossil record.
Trilobites often lived in the very deep (thus, very dark) sea bottom. The eye lens was designed specifically to function in low-light water environments. To do this, trilobites "possessed the most sophisticated eye lenses ever produced," and their vision may actually have been superior to modern living animals (Shawver, 1974, p. 72).

The trilobite eye is as advanced as many of the most modern eyes known. Marine biologist Richard Ellis called the compound trilobite eye, a system containing hundreds of lenses, "far more complicated than the eyes of any vertebrates" (Ellis, 2001, p. 7). The once misnamed "simple primitive" trilobite eye is now known to be an incredibly well-designed, complex optical-chemical system.

A compound eye is constructed from a large array of separate eye optical elements called ommatidia. Each ommatidia was pointed in a different direction to allow the trilobite to simultaneously see in front, on each side, and behind, giving it a panoramic view of the world (Fortey et al., 2004). A network of neurons then translated the many optical images picked up by the compound eye photoreceptors into a single composite picture. This eye design is found today in insects and crustaceans (Levi-Setti, 1993).

The Three Basic Trilobite Eye Designs


Schizochroal

 A large amount of variety exists in both the body and the eye design of the estimated 5,000 different trilobite genera. Three basic designs exist.

The Holochroal variety was both the most common and the most complex design. It consisted of thousands of small hexagonal-shaped lenses that functioned together as a unit.


Holochroal

The Schizochroal eye had fewer and larger biconvex lenses that were set in a turret-like arrangement, separated by an intrascleral membrane. It is found only in the Phacopida trilobite order. It is a "visual system quite different from any other eye that has ever appeared in the animal kingdom" (Levi-Setti, 1993, p.43, see also Fortey et al., 2004, p.449). This eye appears fully formed in the fossil record during the late Cambrian period.


Abathochroal

The Abathochroal eye resembled the schizochroal, except that it did not have interlensral membranes between individual lenses.


The Trilobite Eye Lens

Trilobote eyes were usually hexagon shaped, but some used square, elongated clear calcite prisms (Fortey et al., 2000). The result was a design that had a huge advantage in low light. The lens used the spherical aplanatic design that largely eliminated the spherical aberration problem, the distortion caused by the lens shape (Fortey et al., 2004). According to Levi-Setti (1993, p.54):

The discovery of this optical doublet comes as somewhat of a shock - that trilobites developed and used such device half a billion years ago makes the shock even greater. And a final discovery - that the refracting interface between the two lens elements in a trilobite's eye was designed in accordance with optical constructions worked out by Descartes and Huygens in the mid-17th century - borders on sheer science fiction. (emphasis added)

Conclusion

Acidiphorus had holochroal eyes

Lack of evidence for trilobite eye evolution is especially problematic for Darwin's theory. After decades of new fossil discoveries by many researchers, no transitional fossils exist for their origins. In short, "trilobites are both complex and diverse when they appear in the lower Cambrian." (Black, 1988, p. 158).

Trilobite eyes, which are among the most complex eyes known, appear abruptly and very early in the fossil record. The trilobite eye optics were anything but primitive and would have required an enormous amount of time to evolve, and there are no documented ancestral precursors. As Levi-Setti (1993, p. 54) concluded, the "real surprise" is that the "basic lens designs" of trilobite eyes were engineered "with such ingenuity."

This evidence contradicts Darwin's (1859) prediction that the earliest eyes should be primitive and that a large number of transitional forms proving eye evolution from simple to complex would be found in the fossil record.

References (selected)
 
Black, R. 1988. The Elements of Palaeontology. 2nd Edition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
 
Darwin, C. 1859. The Origin of Species. John Murray, London, UK.
 
Ellis, R. 2001. Aquagenesis: The Origin and Evolution of Life in the Sea. Viking. New York, NY.
 
Fortey, R.A, R.M. Owens, D.E.G. Briggs and M.A. Wills. 2000. Trilobite! Eyewitness to Evolution. Knopf, New York, NY.
 
Fortey, R.A, R.M. Owens, D.E.G. Briggs and M.A. Wills. 2004. The lifestyles of the trilobites: these denizens of the Paleozoic Era seas were surprisingly diverse. American Scientist 92:446-453.

Levi-Setti, R. 1993. Trilobites. University of Chicago Press, Chicago IL.
 
Shawver, L.J. 1974. Trilobite eyes: an impressive feat of early evolution. Science News 105:72-73.

The Anchor Holds, by Ray Boltz, sung by Marko

Hello friends!

I sang "The Anchor Holds" by Ray Boltz, on Aug 15, 2010 at my home church, Fellowship Bible Church of Philadelphia.



If you don't see the DivShare control above, you can listen at
http://www.divshare.com/download/12659926-b02.

Thank you for listening!